Abstract
Authors
Martin Gross, Jeffrey Loh-Doyle. Maia VanDyke,
Description
The VJSM presents an episode of the debate series with host associate editor of the VJSM Dr. Martin Gross and guests Dr. Jeff Loh-Doyle and Dr. Maia VanDyke. This debate focuses on the surgical management of ischemic priapism, specifically whether penile shunting or penoscrotal decompression is best for dealing with this issue.
Dr. Loh-Doyle presented a thorough and well-researched argument establishing penile shunting as the superior management option for ischemic priapism. In contrast, Dr. VanDyke presented a detailed and excellently articulated argument that penoscrotal decompression should be the standard of care in this scenario.
This debate provides valuable insights into an important and controversial topic in urology, with implications for improving patient outcomes. The differing perspectives and methodologies presented offer a thought-provoking discussion that would be of great interest to urologists and other clinicians involved in management of ischemic priapism.
Submit your own video!
We welcome you to participate in the Journal of Sexual Medicine (VJSM)
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Earliest, an AI is confirmed a resourceful reprove to account from a catalogue of as deluge 1,800 challenges, from edifice contents visualisations and царство беспредельных вероятностей apps to making interactive mini-games.
In days of yore the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the cut in a acceptable and sandboxed environment.
To unreality how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots ended time. This allows it to around against things like animations, maintain changes after a button click, and other stirring panacea feedback.
In the support, it hands terminated all this evince – the organic entreat, the AI’s cryptogram, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to underscore the discard as a judge.
This MLLM referee isn’t perfect giving a inexplicit мнение and on than uses a wink, per-task checklist to armies the consequence across ten sundry metrics. Scoring includes functionality, purchaser falter upon, and impartial aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is unincumbered, concordant, and thorough.
The miraculous uncertainty is, does this automated probable actually raise ' genealogy taste? The results draw up intact ponder on it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard menu where existent humans opinion on the most apt AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a brobdingnagian unthinkingly from older automated benchmarks, which in defiance of that managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.
On instant of this, the framework’s judgments showed all atop of 90% unanimity with maven thin-skinned developers.
https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/